Utilisateur:AventGelinas474

De Transcription | Bibliothèque patrimoniale numérique Mines ParisTech
Version du 8 octobre 2020 à 19:34 par AventGelinas474 (discuter | contributions)

(diff) ← Version précédente | Voir la version courante (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

5 Reproducibility Tests You Can Use For Estimating Uncertainty

Two essential constraints on the replicability of scientific results relaxation in limits to the precision of measurement and the potential for altered results as a result of generally delicate variation in the methods and steps performed in a scientific study. We expressly consider each right here, as they can every have a profound affect on the replicability of scientific research. A Gage R and R study is a designed experiment to study the variation in measurement outcomes. The experiment is design to find out how much variation is because of the take a look at method and the way much is as a result of operators. Accuracy is determined by comparing the instrumental values to a known normal.

The first to stress the importance of reproducibility in science was the Irish chemist Robert Boyle, in England in the 17th century. Boyle's air pump was designed to generate and examine vacuum, which at the time was a really controversial idea. Indeed, distinguished philosophers corresponding to René Descartes and Thomas Hobbes denied the very risk of vacuum existence. Historians of science Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, of their 1985 guide Leviathan and the Air-Pump, describe the debate between Boyle and Hobbes, ostensibly over the nature of vacuum, as basically an argument about how helpful data must be gained. Boyle, a pioneer of the experimental method, maintained that the foundations of knowledge must be constituted by experimentally produced details, which may be made plausible to a scientific community by their reproducibility.

In 2017, an article printed in Scientific Data instructed that this may not be sufficient and that the entire das kunstwerk im zeitalter seiner technischen reproduzierbarkeit hausarbeit analysis context must be disclosed. In 2015, psychology turned the first self-discipline to conduct and publish an open, registered empirical study of reproducibility called the Reproducibility Project. A group of 270 researchers from around the globe collaborated to duplicate one hundred empirical studies from three high psychology journals.

The repeatability of an instrument is how close the identical operator, utilizing the identical measurement procedures, can duplicate the measurement of a take a look at sample on the same instrument over a brief time period. The reproducibility of an instrument is how close the measurements of a single test pattern are when the same measurement procedures are used but when the operator, the instrument and/or the laboratory are changed.

Measurements made by the same operator on the same instrument utilizing the same process over an extended time frame can be used to find out reproducibility. Psychology has seen a renewal of inner concerns about irreproducible results. Researchers confirmed in a 2006 examine that, of 141 authors of a publication from the American Psychology Association empirical articles, 103 (73%) didn't reply with their knowledge over a six-month interval. In a comply with up examine printed in 2015, it was found that 246 out of 394 contacted authors of papers in APA journals didn't share their data upon request (sixty two%). In a 2012 paper, it was advised that researchers should publish information together with their works, and a dataset was launched alongside as a demonstration.