Cultural Memory: The Hyperlink Between Past Current And Future

De Transcription | Bibliothèque patrimoniale numérique Mines ParisTech
Révision datée du 12 novembre 2025 à 23:34 par ConstanceMiddlet (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « <br>At first look, [http://www.career4.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=ci_consulting&wr_id=281705 Memory Wave] appears one thing inert, stuck in the past - a memory of someth... »)
(diff) ← Version précédente | Voir la version actuelle (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher


At first look, Memory Wave appears one thing inert, stuck in the past - a memory of something that has occurred and stopped in time. But a better look reveals that memory is dynamic and connects the three temporal dimensions: evoked at the current, it refers to the past, but all the time views the long run. During their conference entitled ‘Communicative and Cultural Memory’, researchers Jan Assmann and Aleida Assmann, both professors at the University of Konstanz, addressed this dynamic character of memory. Jan spoke on the sturdiness and symbolic facets of cultural memory, emphasizing their function in the development of identities, while Aleida prioritized contemporary historical narrative, focusing on mnemonic processes associated to the formation of latest nation-states. The occasion, held on Might 15 at IEA, opened the conference cycle ‘Spaces of Remembrance’, which the researchers uttered within the country from May 15 to 21 as part of the Yr of Germany in Brazil.



The cycle has been a realization of the Federal College of Paraná (UFPR) and the Institute for Superior Research on Social and Cultural Mobility, with the assist of IEA and different establishments. Jan made a distinction between two forms of memory: the communicative one, associated to the diffuse transmission of memories in everyday life via orality, and cultural memory - in which the speech was centered - referring to objectified and institutionalized memories, that can be stored, transferred and reincorporated throughout generations. Cultural memory is formed by symbolic heritage embodied in texts, rites, monuments, celebrations, objects, sacred scriptures and different media that serve as mnemonic triggers to initiate meanings associated with what has happened. Also, it brings again the time of the legendary origins, crystallizes collective experiences of the previous and can final for millennia. Therefore it presupposes a information restricted to initiates. Communicative memory, on the other hand, is proscribed to the recent previous, evokes personal and autobiographical reminiscences, and is characterized by a short term (eighty to 110 years), from three to 4 generations.



Attributable to its informal character, it does not require experience on the part of those who transmit it. Jan identified the connections between cultural memory and id. Based on him, cultural memory is ‘the faculty that permits us to construct a narrative image of the past and by way of this process develop a picture and an identity for ourselves’. Therefore, cultural memory preserves the symbolic institutionalized heritage to which individuals resort to construct their own identities and to affirm themselves as part of a bunch. This is feasible because the act of remembering includes normative facets, so that ‘if you need to belong to a community, Memory Wave you will need to observe the principles of how and what to remember’, as acknowledged by the researcher. He also highlighted that, by working as a collective unifying force, cultural memory is taken into account a hazard by totalitarian regimes. As an example, he mentioned the case of the Bosnian struggle, when Serbian artillery destroyed the Library of Sarajevo in an try and undermine the memory of the Bosnians and minorities in the region.



The aim, he stated, was to make tradition a clean slate so that it might be potential to start out a new Serbian identification from scratch: ‘This was the technique of the totalitarian regime to destroy the past, as a result of if one controls the current, the past also gets beneath control, and if one controls the past, the longer term also will get beneath control’. Aleida opened her convention calling attention to a characteristic phenomenon of the current many years: a disbelief in the idea of the longer term and the emergence of the past as elementary concern. In keeping with the researcher, from the 1980s, confidence sooner or later as a promise of better days lost energy and gave rise to the restlessness earlier than the previous: ‘the idea of progress is more and more obsolete, and the past has invaded our consciousness’. This phenomenon, she mentioned, is the effect of the interval of excessive violence of the twentieth century and new problems faced by contemporary society, such because the environmental crisis, for example.



But she cautioned that it's not mere nostalgia or rejection of modern occasions, since cultural memory is at all times directed to the future, ‘remembering ahead, so to speak’. Thus, memory appears as a gadget to protect the past against the corrosive action of time and MemoryWave Guide to present subsidies for individuals to grasp the world and know what to expect, ‘so they don't have to reinvent the wheel and MemoryWave Guide begin each era from scratch’, as the researcher explained. Based mostly on the idea of ‘les lieux de mémoire’ (places of memory) ready by the French historian Pierre Nora, Aleida talked about the adjustments that have taken place in the construction of nationwide memory within the publish- World War II and post-Berlin Wall. Considering from the case of France - a country that could be outlined by the triumphant character of its individuals -, the concept of places of memory refers to concrete symbolic objects corresponding to monuments, museums and archives, linked to a self-image of heroism and satisfaction by the nations.
answers.com